"Sure, they’re contemplating a 'baby bonus.' But they’re also cutting funding for children’s health, reversing PFAS and lead pipe rules, eliminating food safety measures, and attacking vaccines. Call it two sides of the eugenicist coin."
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Harris’ campaign offered a $6k newborn tax credit and would’ve kept all the good policies/programs intact. Their baby bonus doesn’t replace pro-family infrastructure, but it would’ve been good in an administration that is actually pro-family.
A *baby bonus* type scheme to increase birth rates has been tried in a number of countries South Korea, Hungary, Denmark etc etc … with very limited results EVERY SINGLE TIME.
Comments
It doesn’t work.