some drs will claim i don’t have SPS because i don’t have the major clinical features
but i have the antibody
and the reason the clinical features are so horrific and extreme is bc NOBODY DIAGNOSED THEM EARLIER
a lot of times diagnostic criteria = someone neglected for decades
but i have the antibody
and the reason the clinical features are so horrific and extreme is bc NOBODY DIAGNOSED THEM EARLIER
a lot of times diagnostic criteria = someone neglected for decades
Comments
Bad studies lead to outdated protocols. It's easy to implement a new protocol for something we didn't have, but changing an existing protocol and getting everyone up to date, getting Drs to sign off on it, phasing out the old protocol, it's all a nightmare.
i’m surprised by how many newer “pro” medical web sites and even research makes claims about it being “controversial” or not existing AFTER the new research proves it
(controversial?? is that a scientific term? how do you measure that??)
They learn something like 10years ago and never re-assess their original knowledge
And controversial is very much a thing in medicine
"We've been doing it this way forever! Why would we change?!"
Compression only CPR
Mechanical compressions by a CPR device
Magnesium Sulfate for asthmatics not responding to albuterol
Early CPAP for CHF patients
Or if you look back even further:
Wearing gloves.
the claim that NCGS doesn’t exist comes exclusively from not looking. when they looked, they found hard proof in blind studies of measurable immune response