In this new paper we discuss research gaps related to setting guidelines for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Whereas traditional research agendas focus on extending knowledge in this area more generally, this paper points to specific gaps for guidelines.
https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/fulltext/9900/gaps_in_knowledge_relevant_to_the__icnirp.208.aspx
Whereas traditional research agendas focus on extending knowledge in this area more generally, this paper points to specific gaps for guidelines.
https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/fulltext/9900/gaps_in_knowledge_relevant_to_the__icnirp.208.aspx
Comments
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.1201/b16968/epidemiology-electromagnetic-fields-martin-roosli
https://www.bfs.de/EN/topics/emf/competence-centre-emf/reports/reports-spotlight/reports-spotlight_node.html;jsessionid=CDD331FCA4A757F149BEEF68781FD031.internet592
https://health.ec.europa.eu/consultations/scheer-public-consultation-preliminary-opinion-scientific-evidence-radiofrequency_en?s=09
https://www.emf-portal.org/en
https://www.emf-health-cluster.eu/
https://www.who.int/health-topics/electromagnetic-fields
https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety
https://ncrp-qa.v-studios.com/science/
And here “get the facts"
https://ncrp-qa.v-studios.com/get-the-facts/