I agree with Parker here: a significant chunk (if not most) of the leopards-eating-faces stories we are seeing right now are better framed as "the mainstream media knowingly misled their readers/viewers by covering Trump's obviously false campaign statements as though he weren't a pathological liar
Reposted from
Parker Molloy
The problem I have with these sorts of pieces is that they don't acknowledge the role that the press played in spreading Trump's obvious lies. Like yeah, this lady in WaPo thought Trump was going to make IVF free. I wonder where she got that idea...
Comments
(Also, let's not forget the rhetoric people were fed was still a racist and transphobic one.)
People made a deliberate choice to listen to the media, & simply want to avoid accountability for their choices.
It's the same vibe I got from like... 2006 era Iraq war coverage.
If nothing else, people re-rationalizing their prior actions like that is a sign that they are changing I guess... Might be too late tho...
And that's the problem.
We had the exact same in the UK after Brexit. Fishermen, farmers, etc used the "but the politicians and papers lied to us" kind.
"Yes, yes they did lie to you, but unlike 48% of the voters you choose to believe that lie" is what I wanted to reply with.
They massively aided his campaign by pretending he “moderated” on abortion and by taking his disavowals of Project 2025 as genuine.