If you're going to listen to the people who are saying that the sentencing mattered, why are you ignoring all the NY people telling you these idiots are flat wrong or playing semantics games that still don't prove their point?
It boils down to "conviction" vs. "judgment of conviction" in the text.
It boils down to "conviction" vs. "judgment of conviction" in the text.
Comments
You do not have a "judgement of conviction" until after sentencing.
But you don't have to believe me. I'm just floored you're using debunked NY legal people and ignoring other NY legal people telling you opposite.