The arguments in this post have important consequences for how we discuss religious belief and the existence of gods, spirits and souls as well.
Reposted from
Justin Weinberg
"It is a common assumption in philosophy that absolutely everything is up for grabs... there is something right about that. What I am now inclined to doubt, however, is that... any one philosopher can [ethically] open a critical challenge to absolutely anything..."
Comments
I haven't experienced that but I have heard enough about it from those that have.