Why do we call something which has lasted almost 58 years an “occupation”?
In my view, it is not to imply that the regime is temporary, nor that its designers or enforcers see it as such (or, arguably, *ever* saw it as such). /1
In my view, it is not to imply that the regime is temporary, nor that its designers or enforcers see it as such (or, arguably, *ever* saw it as such). /1
Comments