I'm genuinely curious if there's simply a case of poor understanding of contract law, Labour law, and the lengths a foreign company can and will go to protect and enforce their IP amongst those digging their heels in.
(Or is it just really horrid in the US? Or a case of poor negotiation skills?)
(Or is it just really horrid in the US? Or a case of poor negotiation skills?)
Comments
The lawyer would maybe be retained by a representative from the parent company and the 3rd party company overseas in the country affected.
And I'm pretty sure this has happened and there is precedent)
(I feel there's just somethings that a few don't understand how they work and hey maybe I'm way off base in my understanding. If maybe simply be easier in IP law than Labour law for example)