ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
thebandcake.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Ahem
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
twinkiethekid.xyz
•
90 days ago
Made before the current classification system was a thing so it's not tied to that (1917 vs 1951).
We did have "classified" docs in 1774, but not by any system, they just were not made public.
0
reply
[–]
foodlesweaver.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
No. Arrest them in 4 years when they won’t be pardoned immediately.
3
1
reply
[–]
meltedplasticman.bsky.social
•
90 days ago
1
1
reply
[–]
foodlesweaver.bsky.social
•
88 days ago
Yeah, there was that…
0
reply
[–]
texasvulcan.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Agreed. And which law enforcement agency will do this?
1
reply
[–]
readyornaught.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
while we're waiting
https://generalstrikeus.com/strikecard
1
reply
[–]
meltedplasticman.bsky.social
•
90 days ago
can these charges be brought to a judge for an arrest warrant ?
0
reply
[–]
intlsmkgjct.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Add to that the crime of using Signal to the requirement to preserve circumvent presidential records. Criminal and stupid is their brand.
5
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
We did have "classified" docs in 1774, but not by any system, they just were not made public.
https://generalstrikeus.com/strikecard