Still am, you are prevaricating.
But we can go slower if you like.
We agree that a society as laid out in this post, where access to spaces based on a subjective ideology such as gender identity, would be an illiberal one, yes?
https://bsky.app/profile/denad.bsky.social/post/3li37s66lqs27
But we can go slower if you like.
We agree that a society as laid out in this post, where access to spaces based on a subjective ideology such as gender identity, would be an illiberal one, yes?
https://bsky.app/profile/denad.bsky.social/post/3li37s66lqs27
Reposted from
denad
It would mean a society based on subjective ideology OVER objective reality.
The minority who didnt subscribe would either have to feign belief in or be forced to adopt an ideology they dont believe in just to access facilities, or lose access to them purely for a lack of belief.
In short, illiberal
The minority who didnt subscribe would either have to feign belief in or be forced to adopt an ideology they dont believe in just to access facilities, or lose access to them purely for a lack of belief.
In short, illiberal
Comments
However I personally find you a bit tedious, I’m not saying you are just how I experience you.
Maybe worth thinking about for future engagements.
I'm not asking you to like me.
I'm asking you to engage logic & objectivity to answer a Q.
This 👇 would be an illiberal society, wouldn't it?
https://bsky.app/profile/denad.bsky.social/post/3li37s66lqs27
If you can't bring yourself to agree with something as anodyne & self-evident as "a society based upon a subjective ideology is an illiberal one", then you are acquiescing to, if not outright defending, such illiberalism