We are requiring them to change a political economy model that is the power base for their established political parties since 1992. Butter not guns Realistic defense means less welfare state or dystopian net zero fantasies of the green parties which disrupts their internal political arrangements - ThreadSky

zenpundit.bsky.social • 23 days ago

We are requiring them to change a political economy model that is the power base for their established political parties since 1992. Butter not guns

Realistic defense means less welfare state or dystopian net zero fantasies of the green parties which disrupts their internal political arrangements

Comments

zenpundit.bsky.social•23 days ago

It can’t be helped and it doesn’t matter if the next US president is a Democrat or not

If NATO is to continue with US as a guarantor then Europe needs to move to create a viable and realistic conventional deterrence

Games like this are non-starters
Norway needs the US Navy we don’t need Norway

loadsabot.bsky.social•23 days ago

The problem is your list is US priorities. Norway doesn't need to care much about the Mideast or China. It looks like the US is set on a path that will benefit Russia, Norway (and the EU)'s most acute threat. So Norwegians now feel pressure to realign their security to not depend on the US.

loadsabot.bsky.social•23 days ago

NATO has made both sides of the Atlantic safer and richer, but we seem intent on testing its limits. NATO gave the US a way to mitigate risk of Europe fighting itself for a third time. After giving up our seat at the table, we may see a rearmed Europe led by parties like AfD and National Rally.

zenpundit.bsky.social•23 days ago

Not sure how making it harder for the US Navy to protect the northern NATO sea flank would help improve Norwegian security but sure, give it a go. See how that works out

Maybe consult the neighbors first though

loadsabot.bsky.social•23 days ago

This company doesn't think the US Navy will protect Norway in the first place, and is sending the message that Norway (and Europe at large) should go it alone, without the US. Haltbakk Bunkers owner sees the US as too risky a partner, and that's going to be a huge problem if that sentiment grows.

zenpundit.bsky.social•23 days ago

In this instance, a problem for the Baltics, Finland and Scandinavia, not the US

Unless they have a naval fleet I don’t know about in their pocket, they really ought to not provide incentives for the US to move naval assets out of theater

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply