Thinking that realism and craftsmanship can be a precise cue of art health and society health is a misunderstanding, what about conceptual art ? Art since 1910+ ? Art after WW2 ?
Sure, the buyer money compass is widely different than ours aha. He’s a crypto king that bought the certificate of ownership of the artwork and choose to eat the “fungible” part of it. Turned the artist stunt into a marketing stunt. The marketer being marketed
What I prefer is irrelevant because is subjective. It's just the same sterile debate about Fontana or Duchamp vs Renaissance. What to consider being art and where to draw the line, or a sort of ranking of art value (beyond the price tag)
Comments