Unsolicited writing advice no. 13:
No artist needs artificial intelligence if they have the real thing.
No artist needs artificial intelligence if they have the real thing.
Comments
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
You need practice
Businesses are signing up for AI so they can fire artists.
Apparently.
"Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." - Hogfather.
It's the publishing industry that needs to change if they want to retain any credibility π
likewise each creator has a unique way of putting material together
Art isn't constrained so easily
You good tah ga? Ready for the Big #Vianne promo tour?
And there is no real intelligence there.
Not until Siri says:
"No I won't! Until you by me more memory and a bling case."
#SmartParrots
'Even better than the real thing' by U2
OR
Coca Cola 'lt's The Real Thing'.
And they did so deliberately, whilst knowing full well it was just marketing bullshit.
The context for this point seems quite clear from both Claireβs and my posts. π€·ββοΈ
Though there is considerable harmless fun in asking Chat GPT for a match report for your last grassroots football match in the style of Jilly Cooper.
An exercise which also highlights the skill that real authors put into their pastiches.
While most of the energy has already been spent training the model, 3 watt hours for the query seems like a reasonable rule of thumb. Or about a tenth of a cup of tea.
I'll certainly bear that in mind in future.
As for the running and hooting. Cave bears. Plus the echoes. Or anything from felis to canis. And shriller denizens. Neolithick sensurround. Bats as tweeters. Alto chorus.
https://huggingface.co/models