I certainly think it'd be better, both morally and electorally, than saying trans people are icky and don't deserve equal rights. And so i hope it isn't a part of the party, I hope it becomes the driving ethos of the party, to side with workers against billionaires.
I think the relevant question electorally is whether you'd give a politician a pass if they expressed your preferred view on billionaires and went relatively quiet on trans issues, except to say they'd follow the law and reach for "common sense solutions" or something like that.
On a ballot? I voted for Harris who is part of an administrations supporting war crimes, so yeah, I'd vote for the least bad option. But in a primary id support a candidate who put standing against billionaires front, but absolutely clear still that minorities like trans people deserve protection
Comments