While creators have legitimate AI concerns, expanding copyright won’t protect jobs from automation. A win for rightsholders could lead to significant harm, especially for research uses or artistic protections for creators.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Way to try to spin this as a lesser of two evils. Creators HAVE to win, there HAS to be copyright protectiob, otherwise we won't have creators, copyright OR privacy ever again. Seriously, way to lay down on one ear and waiting to die. Seriously ashamed of you today EFF
Trying to follow this logic?
Besides, that's just one of a score of problems it brings. Another is sustainability - soon we need to double energy production and over half of it will be slaving to the needs of AI companies which, and this is true, will never be profitable till we crack nuclear fusion
I’m sorry but I have little sympathy for artists. Their arguments make no sense. The AI “stealing” argument is as logical as saying other artists can’t view my art because they can steal it.
AI and people alike are compression engines from interaction. Neural networks alike will never be lossless.
Comments
That would also solve the #OpenAI-fraud question.
Besides, that's just one of a score of problems it brings. Another is sustainability - soon we need to double energy production and over half of it will be slaving to the needs of AI companies which, and this is true, will never be profitable till we crack nuclear fusion
AI and people alike are compression engines from interaction. Neural networks alike will never be lossless.