getting an abortion ESPECIALLY in cases where not getting one would most likely lead to both mother and child dying.
Similarly with selling organs: If the transplant is survivable for the donor and necessary for the recipient, I don't see why the donor shouldn't be financially compensated.
Comments
If that wasn't the case, this wouldn't be an issue to discuss.
If someone has a moral objection to abortion, then they personally can refuse to get an abortion even if that kills them.
However, they should not prevent anyone else from
Similarly with selling organs: If the transplant is survivable for the donor and necessary for the recipient, I don't see why the donor shouldn't be financially compensated.