This classic work in the history of nationalism argues that the rise of widely available print (esp. newspapers) made it possible for geographically dispersed groups of people to imagine themselves as a roughly coherent entity called "a nation" in which there was an ongoing conversation.
Comments
Why do you think digital media didnβt push us toward a kind of cosmopolitanism?
Seems like Parliament had read their Benedict Anderson.
https://www.abc.net.au/about/legislative-framework/103700608
Danke