The effects on education participation for those receiving the EMA were largest for those with low performance at GCSE, as well as for students for Special Educational Needs and boys. [3/10] - ThreadSky

theifs.bsky.social • 3 days ago

The effects on education participation for those receiving the EMA were largest for those with low performance at GCSE, as well as for students for Special Educational Needs and boys.

[3/10]

Comments

theifs.bsky.social•3 days ago

In response to the EMA, students reduced their time in work significantly. Those in full-time education reduced their earnings by over 10% in response to the extra income.

[4/10]

theifs.bsky.social•3 days ago

However, the EMA didn’t lead to improved performance to school for recipients. There was no increase in vocational qualifications or A Levels, and no increase in university attendance.

[5/10]

theifs.bsky.social•3 days ago

The EMA even had negative effects on employment and earnings in the long run: students were less likely to be earning enough to qualify for National Insurance and more likely to receive out-of-work benefits.

[6/10]

theifs.bsky.social•3 days ago

For those in employment, the EMA also led to possible negative effects: we estimate annual earnings fell by around 1% as a result of the EMA.

Cumulatively across their twenties, this meant the EMA generated a statistically significant reduction in earnings of 3.5%.

[7/10]

theifs.bsky.social•3 days ago

There is tentative evidence that the EMA resulted in a small reduction in criminal behaviour.

Students who performed poorly at GCSE, who were most likely to be brought into education, also saw some reductions in criminal convictions – around 7% – as a result.

[8/10]

theifs.bsky.social•3 days ago

In total, the Education Maintenance Allowance only provided around 40p of benefits to students for every £1 spent.

The large direct benefits for students receiving the cash were lost due to reductions in employment and wages.

[9/10]

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply