2. Solving crime.
Here's the rub. Are we willing to have an unspecified number of crimes solved in exchange for the government tracking our vehicles' movements on every public road in Virginia? Emphatically, NO. Solving crimes is not worth the cost of mass surveillance.
2/9
Here's the rub. Are we willing to have an unspecified number of crimes solved in exchange for the government tracking our vehicles' movements on every public road in Virginia? Emphatically, NO. Solving crimes is not worth the cost of mass surveillance.
2/9
Comments
This is by far the weakest argument. Yes, local law enforcement have ALPRs—at the cost of both money and privacy to VA taxpayers and drivers. Flock charges localities $3k/yr to rent each camera. Stop paying, and the cameras go away.
3/9
@justicefwdva.bsky.social, seen as much support as we have for stopping mass surveillance. Expanding ALPRs to state highways is a DEEPLY unpopular policy.
4/9
5/9
They want the expansion—or no regulations at all.
6/9
7/9
https://justiceforwardva.com/blog/2023/2/20/oppose-mass-surveillance-a-letter-to-the-virginia-general-assembly