We're all so underprepared and underequipped for this moment. But it feels like once you say "there is compelling evidence against this relationship but the public doesn't believe it so we need to do more studies" you should figure out how to answer the question of why more studies would work
Reposted from Jonathan Howard
According to a former editor of JAMA, we need more studies on whether or not vaccines cause autism.

What mistakes does he make?

🧵

Comments