@metalminder.bsky.social would love to see some transparency of who owns Ampwall
Bandcamp founders made music too
The solution to unaccountable platform landlordism isn’t to say that artists make better landlords
How will Ampwall fund itself and be “independent” or “diy”
Bandcamp founders made music too
The solution to unaccountable platform landlordism isn’t to say that artists make better landlords
How will Ampwall fund itself and be “independent” or “diy”
Comments
Ultimately you should use whatever you're happy with
https://ampwall.com/mission
It’s immature. This space needs more than one competitor so that it’s not monopolized by a single party like Bandcamp.
It’s also relevant to anyone with concerns over bandcamps changes in ownership
The goal of Subvert is to create a user owner and controlled platform. So our goals may actually be different
Question my character if you want 🤷
You made comparisons to Goldman Sachs and called it surface level identity politics
It’s not mentioned in the mission page
Again, I see and admire the spirit, intentions, and passion you all have
I stand by the substantive nature of the inquiry - it’s not personal
This is surface level identity politics, not a meaningful systems intervention
I don’t know you, Chris so I wouldn’t take these questions personally.
I see and admire your passion
We believe that distributed, accountable, and transparent ownership is important - especially in this context
What if we offered you both space on our blog to discuss your views and present your approaches? Maybe it would be great for people to learn more :)