Actual scientist here. If you had a modicum of actual interest, I suspect you’d know a bit already. I am not doing research for you. NASA has papers, https://Space.com has papers, biology and evolutionary journals have papers, materials science journals have papers. Try some curiosity.
Comments
So come on, "actual scientist" and give something better than your condescending arrogance.
I think you know exactly why I keep repeating it. It shows there is no way life could have spontaneously arose from a pool of chemicals on the primordial Earth.
In the meantime you'll ignore the fact there is no way a random accumulation of chemicals in a pool could have produced life.
Asking you for evidence to back up your beliefs seems to have angered you. Yet atheists regularly demand proof God exists.
My issue (past the double standard for proof) is that you could easily look up the proof if you were really interested….