2) you make ridiculous claims and assertions that aren’t backed up by science. You are making a classification error about the origin of life. Abiogenesis isn’t a faith proposition, its the only avenue of scientific inquiry on the origin of life, period. Your “revealed” answer is worthless! … - ThreadSky

el5150.bsky.social • 1 day ago

2) you make ridiculous claims and assertions that aren’t backed up by science. You are making a classification error about the origin of life. Abiogenesis isn’t a faith proposition, its the only avenue of scientific inquiry on the origin of life, period. Your “revealed” answer is worthless! …

Comments

vet-ingenting.bsky.social•23 hours ago

The conclusions of Abiogenesis and Evolution have never been proven, namely that life spontaneously arose from non living matter, or that natural section alone can account for evolution. All you have is faith that your failed avenues of inquiry will be successful someday.

el5150.bsky.social•23 hours ago

Natural selection is a fact…please don’t tell me you aren’t on board with this.
Never been proven <>not possible. Dude(or ma’am sorry I should have asked) its just another chemistry problem. It might take 1000 years…thats not a big deal. There is no other scientific ave to explore. Not a big prob.

el5150.bsky.social•1 day ago

3) It answers literally nothing. You’re appealing to a greater mystery. You’ve done nothing to forward understanding. It offers literally nothing. Stop acting like you’ve solved anything. That’s why I’m angry. Ya haven’t done SHIT. Stop pretending. You have no evidence, just claims.

vet-ingenting.bsky.social•23 hours ago

You seem very confused and enraged.

YOU are the one who is supposed to be supplying evidence and proof of what you claim is true.

So far all you can manage is ad hominem and evasion.

You don't support your claim of being an "actual scientist" very well.

el5150.bsky.social•22 hours ago

1) As far as supplying evidence…go look it up, I am not an evidence aggregator. I am not the Pope of Abiogenesis. I do not claim to have the secret to life in a jar as far back as my 1st reply. But its in the lit, not hidden. A cursory google search will turn up hundreds. Urey-Miller isn’t…

el5150.bsky.social•22 hours ago

2) the only experiment ever made…actually its still churning out new data which is cool. The models and discoveries are complex and astounding, the data vast. In fairness to you if you are honestly interested, you need to investigate. It’d be like trying to explain quantum mechanics to you on here.

el5150.bsky.social•22 hours ago

3) Finally your attack of a data supported theory is rich because you have no data by your own admission. You have claims and not evidence. I could care less what you believe, I hope you love those beliefs, and they bring you comfort and joy. That shit is not FACTs.

el5150.bsky.social•22 hours ago

4) If your position was “you know I find abiogenesis really hard to swallow. I have these religious beliefs…I feel like if anything God must have given that 1st spark of life…yadda yadda yadda, but keep on sciencing fellas!” 100% not a bad word would be said. High five all around!

el5150.bsky.social•23 hours ago

Actual Scientist feels like he has to spoon feed you to understand, and is very dismayed at your stance on evolution, lack of understanding of irony, organic chemistry, biochemistry, and evidence.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply