ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
onelifestand87.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
Was genuinely suprised to find people shitting on Antman 3 for being fun filler. Like guys - it’s Antman. What do you want?
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
onelifestand87.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
I also really liked the ending of him being unsure he’d doomed everyone. Shame that’ll go nowhere now
2
reply
[–]
nutedawn.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
All three Ant-Man films are identical in quality. I can understand hating all three or loving all three but pretending they belong in totally different brackets baffles me
1
1
reply
[–]
paulframe85.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
It felt like 3 had less of the fun things that 1 and 2 had.
1
1
reply
[–]
onelifestand87.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
I think one the things that doesn’t really work (MODOK) is more high profile compared with the first two but otherwise it’s fine. I had fun with it
2
reply
[–]
enlightbystand.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
I think part of the problem is that it was sold as the introduction of Kang as the major force, so it was expected not to be fun filler…
2
1
reply
[–]
onelifestand87.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
I thought no one knew he was in it? I didn’t & I was watching on streaming
0
1
reply
[–]
enlightbystand.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
No, it was all over the trailers - this one is how it was being sold, more Ant-Man v Kang (or even Kang v Ant-Man) rather than fun Paul Rudd romp 3
https://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3289957657?ref_=ext_shr_lnk
2
1
reply
[–]
onelifestand87.bsky.social
•
84 days ago
That’s one of the benefits of avoiding trailers then
2
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
https://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3289957657?ref_=ext_shr_lnk