Never forget, if you design a city for cars, it fails for everyone, including drivers.
If you design a multi-modal city that makes walking, biking and public transit attractive options, it works better for everyone, including drivers.
INCLUDING DRIVERS.
The “war on cars” has always been a lie.
If you design a multi-modal city that makes walking, biking and public transit attractive options, it works better for everyone, including drivers.
INCLUDING DRIVERS.
The “war on cars” has always been a lie.
Comments
https://youtu.be/040ejWnFkj0?si=4xfPzgCNFd0XP44-
No one said you aren't allowed to drive.
What we want is infrastructure that benefits EVERYONE, not just drivers.
*choice in transportation**
**also, that OTHER pro-choice too
Driving is incredibly expensive, it’s just that most of its costs are foisted onto non-drivers.
This shouldn't be hard to understand, even for die-hard car maniacs.
Driving in cities should be rare, extremely expensive, and enjoyable.
Except I'm certain you would.🙂
However, planners have consistently got it wrong in the later years and so retroactively trying to accommodate feet, cycles, buses, trams, trains, commercial vehicles and cars is chaotic.
... Continues in comments below ...
... electric and diesel vehicles who pay less at the pump. Lastly all owners of a road going vehicle including trailers pay an annual vehicle registration that contributes to costs related to accident injuries as well as roading
Drivers should be paying far more than they do.
The rest of us are literally subsidizing drivers.