Two things can be true at once.
1. Meta has long had a real problem of excessive moderation and censorship, mostly caused by its own automated systems, not fact-checkers
2. Zuckerberg is ending fact-checking now because it's the politically expedient thing to do for him and Meta
1. Meta has long had a real problem of excessive moderation and censorship, mostly caused by its own automated systems, not fact-checkers
2. Zuckerberg is ending fact-checking now because it's the politically expedient thing to do for him and Meta
Comments
Just admit you're Trump's bitch and will do anything to make him happy so you can keep taking in big bucks.
System designed in a way that almost encouraged checks on more esoteric stuff from regular users.
Rohingyas was slaughtered because Facebook didn’t stop the campaign.
‘Starting in the US, we are ending our third party fact-checking program and moving to a #CommunityNotes model.’ https://about.fb.com/news/2025/01/meta-more-speech-fewer-mistakes/
HRW "documented over 1,050 takedowns and other suppression of content Instagram and Facebook that had been posted by Palestinians... 1,049 involved peaceful content..."
https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and
https://bsky.app/profile/dodyg.bsky.social/post/3lf5fhrv7tc2e
Delete your content, not your profiles.
Post or send DMs to bring people HERE!
Growing Bluesky and removing Daily Active Users from X and Meta weakens the power of their platforms.
Let's grow and strengthen OUR community!
They are immutable, they are not subject to bias….your bias may drive behaviour/ decisions that change a fact or interpretation, but not he fact as it is.
If you replace the platform’s moderation and fact checking systems with community-based alternatives, you can say you’re not the one controlling content recommendations. The users are.