"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose," Roberts said in a statement regarding Trump's demand for impeachment of Judge Boasberg. - ThreadSky

altspaceforce.altgov.info • 5 days ago

"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose," Roberts said in a statement regarding Trump's demand for impeachment of Judge Boasberg.

Comments

rubyroubaix.bsky.social•5 days ago

when you realise the leopards aren't fussy which judge's face they eat

trifid73.bsky.social•5 days ago

And a Texas congressman just filed impeachment charges anyway.

Insane Trump enabling sycophants are going to destroy the USA.

warofthebees.bsky.social•5 days ago

Yeah well, his balls are still the same size as Schumer's when it comes to this shit so words don't mean much to me.

clarlune.bsky.social•5 days ago

O what a brave, brave man! 😼

unclepapa808.bsky.social•5 days ago

Can’t wait for Felon 47’s response to SCOTUS on Truth Social

trifid73.bsky.social•5 days ago

Liesocial more like...

blueskyredhawk.bsky.social•5 days ago

You built this train, fucker. Don't pretend to be trying to keep it from destroying us.

this-timeline-sux.bsky.social•5 days ago

How’s that “Thank you again, I won’t forget” thing fairing now?

carlig.bsky.social•5 days ago

Out of curiosity, what would it take to encourage the Supreme Court to reverse their decision on giving presidential immunity?

altspaceforce.altgov.info•4 days ago

Either some presidential action so egregious that immunity is challenged at the SCOTUS level or a Congressional law for/against immunity that makes it back to SCOTUS to affirm or modify
They can't make adjustments without a case.

carlig.bsky.social•4 days ago

Thank you for the response! Somehow I feel like this isn’t all that far off, but only time will tell.

defianceblossoms.bsky.social•5 days ago

He's only worried because this threatens his own power.

Even though he ruled on presidential immunity. He can go ahead and enjoy the results of that ruling for himself.

rogueresistknitter.bsky.social•4 days ago

I'm wondering if he's finally ruing the day.

thefeatheredrose.bsky.social•5 days ago

Yeah but how will he vote when that appellate review process eventually ends up before him and the rest of the Supreme Court?

alt-ssa.altgov.info•5 days ago

Hopefully this isn't a "hold your horses, we can strike this down and make it look good and legal" type of statement.

jamjam66.bsky.social•5 days ago

Are we sure it will even get as far as the supreme court? I mean hes already ignoring the courts.

thefeatheredrose.bsky.social•5 days ago

Though I suppose I'm happy to see him at the very least making such a statement. In this climate even such an obvious action is not guaranteed.

miafarrago.bsky.social•5 days ago

FAFO atteetood suddenly pops up in the courts when Prez tries to muscle in. Give that man an RV and shut him up. Whos he think he is, like king of the Supreme Court or something?

amardguru.bsky.social•5 days ago

For more than two centuries, it has also been established that we don't have a king. Somehow that little detail escaped you when you crowned Trump with your immunity gift.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply