Woopsies! Just a few wee omissions - only the important matters for people living and working in the City of Hobart
“Whether and how the site and area is capable of accommodating the traffic, transport and pedestrian access needs” for stadium events. 1/6
“Whether and how the site and area is capable of accommodating the traffic, transport and pedestrian access needs” for stadium events. 1/6
Reposted from
Garth-Gasu ガース in日本語
“The plans for the project are not provided as a consolidated set of plans with detailed description of the use and development … Plans provided present a concept design.”
Mac Pt proposal falling short on planning info.
deja vu Gunns pulp mill 2.0
tasmanianinquirer.com.au/news/macquar...
Mac Pt proposal falling short on planning info.
deja vu Gunns pulp mill 2.0
tasmanianinquirer.com.au/news/macquar...
Comments
Whether and how the project “is in accordance with relevant state policies relating to use and development of coastal land, site contamination and water quality” 3/6
“How the stadium’s operation relates to what appears to be unfunded and unscoped transport system improvements”, such as a northern access road, and public transport and mass pedestrian access 4/6
The effect of “with-the-stadium” and “without-the-stadium” scenarios for Tasmania and the likely impact on the state’s finances. They included “the cumulative impact on future deficits and debt services costs of the state borrowing to fund all capital works and all ongoing operational deficits” 6/6
Or would Hobart finally built a mass transit system just so it could have that fucking stadium?