your literal argument is that it never existed
we gave you a example of it existing
literally nothing you said disproves that trans people existed
you said they dont exist because its a recent concept
i said the word for it might be recent but that doesnt mean shit
we gave you a example of it existing
literally nothing you said disproves that trans people existed
you said they dont exist because its a recent concept
i said the word for it might be recent but that doesnt mean shit
Comments
x word wasnt used therefore its not real and you trying to debate this is anachronism
its a nothing argument because it doesnt disprove or prove anything is just a nothing burger that stales conversation
i think your critical thinking skills are just lacking actual bases
we are saying thats a dumb argument that doesnt actually add anything
its almost like its bad faith
also can you show the books that disagree with trans people existing cuz they are too recent
like genuinely again you say its not real because its modern we say theres at least similar examples in the past you say its not the same because they didnt get called trans and they didnt go through psychologists and were diagnosed with disphoria or some shit