ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
dalevince.com
•
32 days ago
Rachel Reeves talked about the need to fight for growth. I agree - but the fight we need to have is not over some new runways…
Your browser does not support HLS video playback.
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
twosidesbalance.bsky.social
•
32 days ago
I agree Dale, you don't need to make it a fight.
It's false to claim you're obliged to fight the party you helped at the election to defend the global climate over UK runways.
It's a choice.
Over 400 airports are being built/planned globally and Labour is fighting the rise of the far right.
1
1
reply
[–]
twosidesbalance.bsky.social
•
32 days ago
Labour has to manage long-standing, emerging and imminent risks.
They do so on behalf of all citizens whose priorities vary.
As threats of one risk rise, mitigations of other risks adjust.
Example, if ww3 started, you'd accept climate plans would change.
Trump, AFD, Musk etc have changed risks.
0
reply
[–]
mathcee.bsky.social
•
32 days ago
Are you regretting not supporting the Green Party now? Especially after Labour’s rather crass ‘don’t let bats and newts stand in the way’ jibe. I fear nature will suffer greatly on their watch.
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
It's false to claim you're obliged to fight the party you helped at the election to defend the global climate over UK runways.
It's a choice.
Over 400 airports are being built/planned globally and Labour is fighting the rise of the far right.
They do so on behalf of all citizens whose priorities vary.
As threats of one risk rise, mitigations of other risks adjust.
Example, if ww3 started, you'd accept climate plans would change.
Trump, AFD, Musk etc have changed risks.