I like the footnote on lying, how she clearly identified the appointments clause issue, sounds like plaintiffs have a strong case but they can’t prove it happened already
That “imminent harm” is the same reasoning leading to women dying from lack health of reproductive health care in red states. “We can’t intervene until it’s a crisis” FFS. Then it’s too late.
Chutkun is saying as long as the trump administration lies and obfuscates she doesn't have enough evidence to issue a TRO. Why doesn't she just issue the TRO and have the trump administration show evidence that DOGE is legit ?
A big COVER-UP is under way to protect Elon Musk/his companies from lawsuits/court actions in the U.S./ internationally for illegally accessing Americans' & foreign peoples'/entities' data.
Trump & Elon have repeatedly said/written Musk was in charge of DOGE. Now they're LYING to protect Elon.
$TSLA
ffs, if the unions can’t sue on behalf of 4m people to stop it and the states can’t sue on behalf of ALL THEIR CITIZENS to stop it WHO THE FK CAN? THIS IS INSANE
I understand why they’re denying the TRO, especially with that last line about how it must be indisputable.
But “people may be harmed doesn’t rise to the level so i can’t stop the thing they’re doing and we agree will happen” is some of the dumbest fking logic i’ve ever seen committed to paper.
Not as discouraging as it initially comes across as. If she had granted it, she would potentially be stepping out of her bounds. She is staying for now because it's actually bigger than this and she sees it but they cannot move yet.
There will likely be some interesting opinions and maybe some changes in light of the "elon isn't an employee" declaration. That will have implications.
Comments
This phrase will be end of this nation. We allowed our own government to determine whether or not the government harmed you.
This isn't a real country, we're a 249 year old lump of mistakes.
/edit would be nice
Trump & Elon have repeatedly said/written Musk was in charge of DOGE. Now they're LYING to protect Elon.
$TSLA
information gets in the felon and his parasite minions hands
But “people may be harmed doesn’t rise to the level so i can’t stop the thing they’re doing and we agree will happen” is some of the dumbest fking logic i’ve ever seen committed to paper.
There will likely be some interesting opinions and maybe some changes in light of the "elon isn't an employee" declaration. That will have implications.
extreme harm to the individual employees, and potentially the institution writ large."
If neither states or employee unions have standing to claim this harm who does? By the time the house is foreclosed on, its to late.