In particular, I'm curious because depending on the PBLLC's home state, a big enough chunk of shareholders (2/3 in Delaware) can alter the public benefit objectives. So, knowing who effectively owns bsky feels important to understand the risk of future ethical drift. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

dave.tf • 711 days ago

In particular, I'm curious because depending on the PBLLC's home state, a big enough chunk of shareholders (2/3 in Delaware) can alter the public benefit objectives. So, knowing who effectively owns bsky feels important to understand the risk of future ethical drift.

Comments

dave.tf•711 days ago

A bit more digging: bsky is a Delaware PBLLC, which is one of the places where PBLLC public benefit objectives have teeth, which is good.

Also found a statement from Dorsey that twtr doesn't own bsky, despite being (afaict?) its sole funding source. So, what _did_ twtr get in return for funding?

snarfed.org•709 days ago

Confirmed just now: https://staging.bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3ju65fvwo6h2q

Any chance you have the link to Jack's own statement handy?

snarfed.org•709 days ago

Re what they got in return, evidently it was more a grant. "Twitter's funding of Bluesky is not subject to any conditions except one: that Bluesky is to research and develop technologies that enable open and decentralized public conversation." https://twitter.com/bluesky/status/1518707606881067008

richburroughs.dev•709 days ago

Apparently Jack still has one of the three board seats too.

dave.tf•709 days ago

not on hand, it was a tweet from Jack in early 2022 I think? I found it via a press article talking about the potential impact to bsky of the twitter buyout, from around the time of the initial purchase offer.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply