The reporting to this point suggests that Luigi intended to affect insurance policy, which is really only coherent if he thought this murder would intimidate insurance company execs to change their policies.
I don't love piled on charges, but at first pass this one fits to some degree
And from what I seen earlier the arraignment judge is married to someone who works for that insurance company so I can be wrong but isn't that a conflict of interest
No. The arraignment judge, whose job is basically clerical, is married to someone who used to be an in-house IP attorney for Pfizer fifteen years ago. It is not a conflict of interest.
Comments
the statute merely says that the crime is committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce *a* civilian population.
I don't love piled on charges, but at first pass this one fits to some degree