Sure but e-fuels made from hydrogen require DAC or PS CCS thus are just as much affected by sensitivity to carbon capture costs as pute DAC (with the exception of storage costs). So relative cost competitiveness changes little.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I personally wouldn't assume similar cost sensitivities between FF CCS PS + T&S vs electrolyser + DAC given that they are quite different asset types (technically and commercially) and actual project demonstrated cost data on key parts of this infrastructure is still very immature.
E-fuels also require DAC + T&S to mitigate non CO2 effects of plane emissions though. They might be less exposed, but they’re still exposed to the same risks as FF+ DACCS.
Comments