From a meta analysis POV you seem quite determined to make the data fit your conclusion and are arguing on that basis.
@gidmk.bsky.social appears to be saying “this is the data and what is the best theory to explain what this data means?”
Have you considered how your approach is problematic?
🤷🏾
@gidmk.bsky.social appears to be saying “this is the data and what is the best theory to explain what this data means?”
Have you considered how your approach is problematic?
🤷🏾
Comments
Good luck with whatever that is doing for you or where it takes you (and ignoring data and analysis that doesn’t support your desired conclusion).
🤷🏾
Here’s another paper for you showing higher illness burden in households with children: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4583580/
If you think this is some sort of process where you cite a study and then I cite a study, you’re missing the point.
And you’re clearly missing the point Gideon’s article makes as well.
Good luck though with whatever *your* point is..
🤷🏾
Why do you think that it’s inappropriate of me to question the downstream consequences of children’s covid infections?
As you haven’t gotten the hint..
All the best with whatever it is you think you’re doing and where you’re going with it. 👍🏾