1A protects your ability to not only speak but also to freely receive speech, so, to your point, there should be no restrictions on OnlyFans if the context is a consenting adult seeking media that other individuals would otherwise censor. This is a different context than performers, of course. - ThreadSky

asura.dev • 36 days ago

1A protects your ability to not only speak but also to freely receive speech, so, to your point, there should be no restrictions on OnlyFans if the context is a consenting adult seeking media that other individuals would otherwise censor.

This is a different context than performers, of course.

Comments

asura.dev•36 days ago

That's not even dipping into what should be a right to be able to use the internet relatively anonymously and not be tracked and not be required to submit personal information to companies if you choose not to.

clintx.bsky.social•36 days ago

Are you saying that Grindr has a 1st amendment right to not be forced to require age verification? If so, that's still a very different assertion from the statement above which says that individuals have a first amendment right to not have to provide age identifying info to an app like Grindr.

asura.dev•36 days ago

1A protects your (not Grindr's) ability to speak and receive speech without censorship and also without the government interfering.
Grindr being forced to ID every user individually would stop you from doing both of the above, and that's where Section 230 comes in.

clintx.bsky.social•36 days ago

230 protects Grindr from being compelled to ID. But implemented that policy on their own, there is no free speech protection for users of Grindr, which is what the above statement implies

asura.dev•36 days ago

I'm not sure we're on the same social media site.
"[...] infringing on “1st Amendment rights of adults who may not want to have their driver’s license uploaded to this site that relates to gay & bisexual relationships.”"

clintx.bsky.social•36 days ago

Again, my point is that the quote is wild. If Grindr were to require age verification as part of their terms of use (of their own volition), that would not infringe on an individual's first amendment rights. I'm over this conversation, but I appreciate your responses!

asura.dev•36 days ago

Oh, good. Thank you.
I'm hoping you find the exact same answer in a better format to help you follow how it should work.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply