Hard news is the only place for neutrality but you can't claim to be hard news out when you're a big organization who has never been a neutral and possess journalist who never will be
I disagree; often it is impossible to take sides, especially when both sides are wrong. Other times it's inadvisable to take sides, when it's not your business, especially between couples
They Have. FOR FAR TOO LONG. THANK YOU GREEDY MASS MEDIA OWNERS. Putin, Murdoch, Bezos, NY Times, Koch, Crow, Leo, SCOTUS 6 Monsters, McConnell, M. Johnson, Zuckerberg, Dorsey, Musk, & ALL THE FOOLISH REPUBLICAN FASCISTS WHO HAVE CREATED THIS DISASTER ! May you all Die a very painful DEATH!
Wiesel then worked with the Foreign Ministry in its attempts to get the conference...canceled or to remove all discussion of the Armenian genocide from it... he provided the Foreign Ministry with internal documents on the conference's planning...lobbied fellow academics to not attend the conference
To compare that to the election right now is a bit much.
The job of Journalism and news media is to inform impartially. I do not understand how people have come to welcome the degradation of journalistic ethics.
it sounds like you're a zealot at that point. Truth and facts have no inate political leaning. Data is something both sides are alergic to... especially yours. when it comes to "helping" minoritity children and familes.
your'e a zealot, Harris imprisoned and denied trans care. twitter is overthere
"truth and fact have no innate political leaning" sure they do, when one side denies truth and facts. and you're making assumptions, harris is certainly not "my side"
so you want them to be impartial and report honestly. very good.
but how is that speaking truth to power? because the news sources you're complaining about being neutral have never spoke truth to power. If i may be rude, just given people a way to outsource your thinking.
Being neutral doesn't give you the moral high ground. When there is such blatant evil to stay silent is moral cowardice. Anyone saying that that they have no opinion on these matters just helps the worst people, as the press is doing. You can criticise both sides, but you can't just be neutral.
Alt text: Top is an image of Ellie Wiesel, survivor of the Holocaust and writer of Night, which is very good and troubling. Below is a quote: “Always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”
Free Palestine. Save the immigrants from orange one and the cop.
Yeah there are things you can say but you don't want to say those things because you disagree with them and because voting is your whole pitiful fucking world.
Hey you followed me and and liked mutual aid posts for Palestinian people and a duck post.
I owe you an apology. I am sorry for saying that your political world was pitiful and limited to electoralism. That was mean. Thank you for being nice in the face of meanness. You've been the bigger person.
Always take sides with the underdog, the oppressed, the least among us. For Christians regardless of denomination, this is not an option–it's a requirement.
Our parents and grandparents sacrificed to defeat Fascism. Time to honor their sacrifices. Join up with the BLUE TROOPS. Every vote COUNTS. 💙🌊💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Nah. I don't think there is always only good/bad situation. It's always better to look what both sides have to say, and how situation looks from outside. Then decide which side to support, if support any. Look at middle east situation. Jews are bad, but Palestine is not innocent either.
Did you mean to say "Jews", or did you mean Israelis?
The Israeli government is behaving very badly, but there is plenty of internal opposition. And although the majority of Israelis are Jewish, the majority of Jews are not Israeli.
She's literally complicit in genocide. To vote Harris is to look the other way from injustice and embrace genocide as a valid form of "harm reduction."
As much as I am for freeing Palestine, they are not our issue right now, we need to fix OUR own issues first before we start solving other peoples problems. As harsh as that is to say its just not our problem right now.
money that is being used to send weapons and "aid" to israel could instead be put towards recovery efforts of the ongoing hurricane disaster. the funding of far right militias across the world could instead be put towards helping people in the us. this is 100% your problem.
Are you joking??? We are DIRECTLY CAUSING their problem! You don't get to support someone exterminating a population and just ignore it because it's not a population here in the US. You've lost your grip on reality.
It seems perfectly fine that the richest man in the world can by press and literally buy the narrative. I dont see what could possibly go wrong with this.
if you pick a side you are picking a mold to believe in. picking a side means you have chosen to fight the other side.
lets say the context you were in a room with 2 people you love and you were forced kill one of them by an external source for what ever reason for example.
one of those people wants to kill the other, and more people too. that'd be a more accurate metaphor. should you love someone who wants to (and will) kill people?
It is not evil to not have an opinion. Not every issue is a struggle between good and evil. Sometimes it's a struggle between two different ways of dealing with a problem. This kind of all or nothing mentality is what has divided us so much and it's destroying our society.
I was at a lecture/Q and A with Elie Wiesel in 2002 at the University of Wisconsin where someone asked what he thought of Palestinians and he said he thought they were the same as Nazis and it broke my heart.
Comments
ig he prolly has a point tho
that's harris.
The job of Journalism and news media is to inform impartially. I do not understand how people have come to welcome the degradation of journalistic ethics.
Reducing this to good versus evil is reductive
https://www.thefp.com/p/i-have-trump-derangement-syndrome?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=260347&post_id=150333452&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=tp9lz&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
don't outsource your thinking or agency.
do you really think a corporate news source that may or may not have monetary interests has your best interests at heart?
like govenrment projects and the public education system keeping minority kids down and calling it "help"..
but i can sure see where you're coming from. especially with the right's anti climate shiz
your'e a zealot, Harris imprisoned and denied trans care. twitter is overthere
and they do that now very poorly. have been for a decade.
there's a thing called ethics too. but why would you want that? it might weaken your "side". do you really have no faith in others?
but how is that speaking truth to power? because the news sources you're complaining about being neutral have never spoke truth to power. If i may be rude, just given people a way to outsource your thinking.
Yeah there are things you can say but you don't want to say those things because you disagree with them and because voting is your whole pitiful fucking world.
I owe you an apology. I am sorry for saying that your political world was pitiful and limited to electoralism. That was mean. Thank you for being nice in the face of meanness. You've been the bigger person.
If there's an all knowing afterlife, Wiesel gets now.
The CEOs did.
The Israeli government is behaving very badly, but there is plenty of internal opposition. And although the majority of Israelis are Jewish, the majority of Jews are not Israeli.
Anyway im moving to jupiter who wants to join me
divide causes conflict and control
*cough cough*
lets say the context you were in a room with 2 people you love and you were forced kill one of them by an external source for what ever reason for example.
Had you to get it ruined with this one, tho?
The rest have been bought.