NACC’s website says a “mandatory” requirement for ppl who refer is to specify “why you think it is corrupt conduct” So why is Brereton saying ppl can refer without any corruption concern, when NACC won’t accept it unless a concern for corruption is raised? Is he lying or stupid? - ThreadSky

strangerous.bsky.social • 101 days ago

NACC’s website says a “mandatory” requirement for ppl who refer is to specify
“why you think it is corrupt conduct”
So why is Brereton saying ppl can refer without any corruption concern, when NACC won’t accept it unless a concern for corruption is raised?
Is he lying or stupid?

Reposted from stranger

Helen Haines looks on concerned & calls out NACC’s Paul Brereton after he claims ppl referring cases to NACC
“Doesn’t mean” they’re concerned of “corruption”😳🤦‍♂️
Haines “would be a fair assumption that most ppl referring to NACC would be doing so bcoz” of “corrupt behaviour”🔥

Comments

noeleenkelly.bsky.social•101 days ago

He's lying and treating us as if we are stupid.

corkscrew2.bsky.social•101 days ago

Commissioner Paul Brereton
is having a lend ....

irenelomis.bsky.social•101 days ago

Trying to make reality fit his narrative.

mezanine.bsky.social•101 days ago

They’re not mutually exclusive!

diogenes-original.bsky.social•101 days ago

Not literally true. If as you say it is what they “think”. That just gets the NACC heading down the same track as the submitter, they don’t have to agree with them.

peggysanders.bsky.social•101 days ago

@whats-left-of-bevo.bsky.social

mick12345.bsky.social•101 days ago

The NAAC is knackered.

rellson.bsky.social•101 days ago

Has Brereton got dementia? He does head up the National Anti Corruption Commission doesn’t he? Maybe he thinks he was appointed to a different position. Bizarre responses.

poppiemike.bsky.social•101 days ago

He is both, + arrogant, wilful, self important and considers himself untouchable

southernaussieson.bsky.social•101 days ago

He is essentially trying to bulltish his way out of the senate inquiry.

mariusmainridge.bsky.social•101 days ago

And so it goes on and on, seems obvious that Breriton is out of his depth or something else is at play, all this time wasting at the expense of the people, is that Ok ?

aussiewitch.bsky.social•101 days ago

Why else would people refer anything to a body specifically set up to investigate corruption FFS is this man stupid

politicalobserver.bsky.social•101 days ago

He's utterly bent.

plmg53.bsky.social•101 days ago

My bet is he’s lying and he thinks we’re stupid,

docbaty.bsky.social•101 days ago

I referred a Cathy Wilcox cartoon. I just thought they might like a laugh.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply