Water is our most precious resource.
But Peter Dutton wants to spend $600 billion in taxpayer money on one of the most water intensive energies, nuclear.
Under Peter Dutton’s proposed nuclear model he will ultimately need three times more water than coal to keep the lights on.
But Peter Dutton wants to spend $600 billion in taxpayer money on one of the most water intensive energies, nuclear.
Under Peter Dutton’s proposed nuclear model he will ultimately need three times more water than coal to keep the lights on.
Comments
Where will the water come from and who will pay for it?
Will farmers foot the bill?
What happens during drought?
From the regions to the city - you’ll be worse off under Dutton.
The sort of drought most of EU, UK & USA could not imagine.
It's foolish to rely upon such a water intensive energy source.
I'm generally thinking up every way I can that will help Labor make Dutton look bad, anywhere and everywhere 😄
I hope Labor emphasises to South Australians how disrespectful the nuclear plan is to us, given our strides and efforts in renewables. Could help win some votes hopefully.
Are there education programs for them to transition to expanding our renewable energy sector?
I have seen that new offshore gas extraction sites are being approved as well as new coal extraction sites.
To a layperson, this appears to be in conflict with the Net Zero plan.
I'm concerned that the process will take too long for the damage to be controlled.
one lot is a backyard abortionist the other is a public hospital abortionist
i would tnot trust them to can free air
so 20 years is right