You asked what the charges are. The answer is YES. Corruption should be prosecuted and the evidence is there. - ThreadSky

ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

mdsapd.bsky.social • 7 days ago

You asked what the charges are. The answer is YES. Corruption should be prosecuted and the evidence is there.

Comments

liberal-are-dopes.bsky.social•6 days ago

The specific charges against Adams you idiot. You don’t have a clue. Mindless fool

mdsapd.bsky.social•6 days ago

That’s literally the indictment 😂

liberal-are-dopes.bsky.social•4 days ago

Judge is going to grant the dismissal because he has to. Now suck on that

mdsapd.bsky.social•4 days ago

He may; he may not. Cheering people getting away with corruption is an odd flex but you do you.

liberal-are-dopes.bsky.social•2 days ago

Can you really describe some upgrades as corruption and a legitimate reason to take out the mayor of nyc? I’d have a very different opinion on trying the case if the charges were about serious corruption.

liberal-are-dopes.bsky.social•5 days ago

The point is that the charges are lame. But I’m sure they could get a jury in nyc to convict him. The jury system in NYC is a joke

mdsapd.bsky.social•4 days ago

I’ve yet to see “the charges are lame” defense in action in court but should be interesting.

liberal-are-dopes.bsky.social•2 days ago

It’s called prosecutorial discretion. It’s where you know you can get any jury in nyc to convict anyone sympathetic to Trump for any charges and you say “nah. That ain’t right. “

mdsapd.bsky.social•2 days ago

I’m familiar. What part of the evidence do you think is weak?

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply