Only a fucking moron would look at the events of that day and say it wasn't an insurrection.
The US legal framework is not structured to deal with insurrection as a concept so what you're doing is you are arguing over semantics not facts.
The US legal framework is not structured to deal with insurrection as a concept so what you're doing is you are arguing over semantics not facts.
Comments
Okay, do you know what 'sedition' means? Look it up. You'll be shocked.
Insurrection is an Act to overthrow
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow
This is why they were not charged under insurrection laws.
This has nothing to do with dictionary definitions.
Stop using weasel words to try and squirm out of the seriousness of what these fuckers did that day.
Just own it, admit that you support it, making you a traitor to your country.