and this genuinely seems to be understood as the expert opinion. somehow we've gotten it in our heads that a critic's role is to play a game, determine how well it's "held up" by some nebulous modern standard, then recommend some wack upscaled version released 40 years later or a qol romhack instead
Comments
like, to know that the same company made *both of these games in the same year* is fucking incredible.
or that four years prior, they made !!space harrier!! and nothing else was quite like it. Wild.