Cc @derekbruff.bsky.social other studies found that ChatGPT feedback was similar quality to feedback for the average student, but gave the same kind of feedback even to brilliant students... so it's basically giving average feedback regardless of writing level. Will find the study.
On principle, my stance is that we write for people to read, not score. If we have a systemic problem of too many students per teacher, we should work on that. In the meantime, anyone studying autonomously of course could benefit from AI-generated feedback, especially in early language learning.
Otherwise we diminish the meaning of writing itself.
I'm OK with AI feedback on mechanics of writing, but not on meaning and so on, you know? Those are meant for humans to read and respond to, imho
Comments
https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/download/1995/849/7057
I'm OK with AI feedback on mechanics of writing, but not on meaning and so on, you know? Those are meant for humans to read and respond to, imho
I can ask ChatGPT, How might someone [in this kind of audience] react to this piece?, and it will give me something to react to.