My understanding is yes, with the caveat that there are also political costs for pulling certain policy levers vs others. In his framework if you pull too many of those levers you don't get to do anything because the other guys are in charge. I think you disagree about these political costs.
Comments
1) You believe that some of the policies that Matt sees as politically toxic could be sold better to the public
2) You believe that arguing with people "to your left" is politically costly and therefore Matt is doing the movement a disservice