So you were repeating a number that you don’t understand anything about and expecting me to refute it. Doesn’t that strike you as somewhat ridiculous? Did you laugh at the people on the right in 2020 doing the same thing? I did. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

ilk.org • 102 days ago

So you were repeating a number that you don’t understand anything about and expecting me to refute it.
Doesn’t that strike you as somewhat ridiculous? Did you laugh at the people on the right in 2020 doing the same thing?
I did.

Comments

wirelessben.bsky.social•101 days ago

I was trusting Spoonamore had a good process, as he had been doing this for 20 years.

Our elections are still extremely hackable, which journalist Jonathan Simon documented in his book "Code Red: Computerized Elections and The War on American Democracy".

wirelessben.bsky.social•101 days ago

Republicans voted down the Safe Act, which required manual audits of election systems, btw.

ilk.org•101 days ago

There already are manual audits of election systems. Nearly every state (I’m not certain they all do) conducts sample-based recounts of paper ballots that would catch significant anomalies, and every election has a number of races that are fully recounted and which never show large discrepancies.

ilk.org•101 days ago

I appreciate your being open to new information; so many people aren’t.

vagilante.bsky.social•102 days ago

I was having a conversation with someone else about a comment they made.

This does strike me as ridiculous, although I suspect for different reasons.

Floor’s yours, enjoy.

wirelessben.bsky.social•101 days ago

My bad.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply