But I don't think the problem of boycotts is that fundamentally different from the problem of unions. There are very few unions in the US, most of them were founded at a different time, and most unionization efforts fail. That is because the average American is comfortable with the status quo. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

sanaer.bsky.social • 16 hours ago

But I don't think the problem of boycotts is that fundamentally different from the problem of unions. There are very few unions in the US, most of them were founded at a different time, and most unionization efforts fail. That is because the average American is comfortable with the status quo.

Comments

sanaer.bsky.social•16 hours ago

I think also the idea that workers in wealthy countries have no power as consumers is something people really want to believe, but I don't think it's true. A consumer wants a T shirt for $10 and across the ocean a child sews it for them. That's an incredible amount of power

sanaer.bsky.social•15 hours ago

I intended to write something more productive on the general topic but I wrote 1500 words of bullet points probably nobody wants to read

sanaer.bsky.social•15 hours ago

To clarify more to the random people who found their way here, I think people in the US are mostly correct to think any particular boycott won't work but that's less because boycotts inherently can't work and more because nobody wants to do them, including the people calling for a boycott

sanaer.bsky.social•13 hours ago

I also think that as one piece of optimism, I think if things get worse enough, people in the US would respond the way people are in Canada.

The problem, aside from things getting worse, is they need to get worse for *everyone*

sanaer.bsky.social•15 hours ago

are people like searching for words in this thread and why

We need private posts on bluesky

sanaer.bsky.social•15 hours ago

I'm kind of morbidly curious about who shows up next

cyrushall.bsky.social•10 hours ago

I think you are also seeing an ideological preference for a world in which capitalism doesn't allow for effective action (ie, "boycotts don't work"). It's a sort of side-door argument against capitalism by removing agency.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply