@jay.bsky.team @jeremie.com @mmasnick.bsky.social
Bsky needs to make guarantees to its users if it's not to become just like its corporate predecessor.
For starters, there are no grounds for permanent suspension where serious and repeat violations did not occur.
Users need faith in your platform.
Bsky needs to make guarantees to its users if it's not to become just like its corporate predecessor.
For starters, there are no grounds for permanent suspension where serious and repeat violations did not occur.
Users need faith in your platform.
Reposted from
filthy
@support.bsky.team needs to look into the flagrant abuse of moderation used against @lykon.dog
Lykon repurposed the data used for @laelaps.fyi to provide similar functionality, without the doxxing, harassment, and user abuse.
Lykon was banned, and given objectively false excuses. See: lykon.dog
Lykon repurposed the data used for @laelaps.fyi to provide similar functionality, without the doxxing, harassment, and user abuse.
Lykon was banned, and given objectively false excuses. See: lykon.dog
Comments
The moderation team becomes directly responsible for enabling these behaviours any time they don't action a report.
Any platform that doesn't deal with antisocials, becomes THEIR platform.
"If you have a problem with seeing their posts, then maybe you shouldn't see their posts, anymore"
All of the social media platforms reserve the right to remove you for literally no reason, as they see fit.
You and me? We don't have a voice here - or anywhere that isn't ours.
I'd love to see this change, but again: I have no faith in places like this. It truly feels like I'm just passing through.
... On my way to Mastodon, most likely.