i cannot believe we still have to go through this discourse
JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY DRAWS A CHARACTER WITH A LARGER BUILD THAN NORMALLY DEPICTED OR EVEN ANY FAT CHARACTER AT ALL DOES NOT MAKE IT FETISH ART
creative liberties do exist, people are allowed to take them with whatever they draw
🧵THREAD🧵
JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY DRAWS A CHARACTER WITH A LARGER BUILD THAN NORMALLY DEPICTED OR EVEN ANY FAT CHARACTER AT ALL DOES NOT MAKE IT FETISH ART
creative liberties do exist, people are allowed to take them with whatever they draw
🧵THREAD🧵
Comments
unless the artist themselves have explicitly stated that what they draw is intended to cater to a fetish demographic, don't just go around declaring that what a person
it is perfectly fine if that's the way you THINK about a drawing, like in your personal opinion it MIGHT be fetish material, but if you say with authority that it is fetish material when that's not even the artist's intentions then that's just kinda dickish
there's even an artist that does that that has greatly inspired a lot of my drawings to this day, but it just
people need to stop getting the idea that fat characters in general
a big difference between fetish art and just art of a fat character would be emphasis; emphasis being on the fat itself where it's the main focal point of the drawing
or even the character being
whereas with a drawing of a fat character, that does not happen
it's just that character but with a thicker coat of fur/skin/whatever, at the end of the day what is just THAT hurting?
it's not just artist facing