They also need to ban anyone who criticizes the spitting chef and boost people who shower the spitting chef with empty compliments because that's what free speech is all about.
help im slow 💀 is this actually what ppl are saying abt bsky? bc this is eerily similar to what my bf said when i tried convincing him to make the switch over from x 😭
Ironic how we associate arguments as bad.
The hierarchy of disagreement is a thing.
Blocking and muting anyone who thinks differently smugly is not the flex you think it is.
Echo chambers are a lack of all disagreement, not the functional respectful disagreement using high level arguments.
Just to be clear, for your comment to pertain to this analogy, you are drawing equivalence between “functional respectful disagreement using high level argument” and spitting in people’s food
blocking dissenting views can lead to groupthink, increased polarization, the spread of misinformation, and a distorted reality. These foster intolerance, irrational decision-making, and social isolation, ultimately undermining healthy discourse & societal cohesion, spitting in food...
that's way too easy. see you always screw up the order just a little bit. scrambled eggs, you make sunny side up. oh you forgot the bacon, oops! silly you. oh medium rare, i swore i heard well done. they throw a fit, and you laugh maniacally!
Comments
The hierarchy of disagreement is a thing.
Blocking and muting anyone who thinks differently smugly is not the flex you think it is.
Echo chambers are a lack of all disagreement, not the functional respectful disagreement using high level arguments.
The analogy is addressing *abusive* views
Spitting in food is not a disagreement about prep time, or proper spicing, for instance
It’s deliberately malicious
Why do you seek to conflate the two?