The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that art created solely by artificial intelligence without human input is not eligible for copyright protection. This decision reaffirms the requirement of human authorship for copyright eligibility.
Comments
"show me a picture of winnie the pooh juggling apples"
is technically human input.... so how do they describe a minimum contribution. if it's not considered "human input"
then a human to have ai create ....
well, hopefully they've considered all this stuff...responsibility is a sticky wicket we don't seem to have a handle on